IceWars *wink* Community
25.02.2018 22:40:49 *
Willkommen Gast. Bitte einloggen oder registrieren.

Einloggen mit Benutzername, Passwort und Sitzungslänge
News:
 
 
   Übersicht   Hilfe Suche Profil Kalender Login Registrieren  
Seiten: [1]   Nach unten
  Drucken  
Autor Thema: Surviving ships did not attack? Bug or what?  (Gelesen 2028 mal)
0 Mitglieder und 1 Gast betrachten dieses Thema.
Reign
Spender
*
Offline Offline

Beiträge: 1.802


320877196
« am: 21.10.2007 17:59:41 »

AFAIR, surviving ships of a defender kill attacking transporters. That's a reason why many prefer raiding with Gorgols instead of Kamels. Today our alliance was attacked, we had survivors, but not a single enemy got destroyed. Are Systrans and Lurch so robust, or is this a bug?
By the way, the KB-import still does not work on the .org server... Rolling Eyes

Zitat
Battle on planet Yuma Prime 3:31:7. (21.10.2007 14:44:35) Owner is DarkCrow [-=SR=-]
The battle was won by the attacking party.

Attacking fleet of Gauss [Krauts], started from Battlestation (3:31:Cool.
Ship name   Number   Destroyed   Survivors
Systrans (Class 1 system transporter)   200   0   200
Lurch (Class 2 system transporter)   100   0   100
Kronk   10   0   10
The fleet dropped coffee and cake.

DarkCrow [-=SR=-] is defending.
Ship name   Number   Destroyed   Survivors
Lurch (Class 2 system transporter)   9   9   0
Scout   1   1   0
Systrans (Class 1 system transporter)   26   26   0
Slayer   5   2   3
Crux (Colonists system transporter)   1   1   0
Probe X11   1059   0   1059
Terminus probe   200   0   200
Pflaumenmus (Carrier)   10   0   10

Defending fleet of Sulya [-=SR=-]
Ship name   Number   Destroyed   Survivors
Systrans (Class 1 system transporter)   1   1   0
Sheep   200   13   187
Pflaumenmus (Carrier)   5   0   5

Defense systems
Name   Number   Destroyed   Survivors
SDI nuclear missiles   50   50   0

The following resources were stolen:
 Deal/Contract

The defender lost the following things:
Iron   16400
Steel   63900
VV4A   650
Ice   450
Chem. elements   32100
Water   600
Energy   48750
Rabbits   725
Population   643
« Letzte Änderung: 21.10.2007 18:00:56 von Reign_of_Fire » Gespeichert

(Klicken zum Darstellen und Verstecken)
Clover

Offline Offline

Beiträge: 2.285


moritzzz@hotmail.com
E-Mail
« am: 21.10.2007 21:24:12 »

when the winning chance is quiet high (what the simulator says) then even kamels would survive without a loss, probably that is the point ?
Gespeichert

Zurzeit nur als Gnom unterwegs (Topfpflanfze - Lvl 31)

Zitat von: Solitaire
Von sinnlosem Spam, hartnäckiger Kleinschreibung, Satzkonstellationen, die nicht einmal einer SMS würdig sind und Texten, bei denen ein Linguist vermutlich einen Herzinfarkt erleiden und ein Sozialforscher seinen ersten Nobelpreis bekommen würde ist absolut alles vorhanden.

Zitat von: Toelpel von Passau
Arguing in a IW-Thread is like running at the special olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded.
Reign
Spender
*
Offline Offline

Beiträge: 1.802


320877196
« am: 24.10.2007 21:43:36 »

Again, another planet, other attack(ers). 6 big daddys against 200 sheep. this time a kamel did not get destroyed. *help*

according to simulator:
Zitat
The attacker wins with 82.28 to 17.72.
, repeating simulations showed/repeated this 80 to 20 ratio. also, quite many ships got destroyed (average in 20-30 simulations: ~65), but this maybe is not that interesting.

Zitat
Battle on planet Tesla 3:49:10. (24.10.2007 17:20:17) Owner is SubWoofer [-=SR=-]
The battle was won by the attacking party.

Attacking fleet of sego [nBnC], started from New Home (3:52:11).
Ship name   Number   Destroyed   Survivors
Kamel Z-98 (Class 1 hyperspace transporter)   1   0   1
Big Daddy   6   0   6
The fleet dropped coffee and cake.

SubWoofer [-=SR=-] is defending.
Ship name   Number   Destroyed   Survivors

Defending fleet of Sulya [-=SR=-]
Ship name   Number   Destroyed   Survivors
Systrans (Class 1 system transporter)   1   1   0
Sheep   200   80   120
Pflaumenmus (Carrier)   5   0   5

The following resources were stolen:
 Deal/Contract

The defender lost the following things:
Iron   8000
Steel   33000
VV4A   4000
Chem. elements   36500
Energy   48500
Population   95
Gespeichert

(Klicken zum Darstellen und Verstecken)
Clover

Offline Offline

Beiträge: 2.285


moritzzz@hotmail.com
E-Mail
« am: 25.10.2007 00:13:03 »

as I said with a ratio of 80 to 20 the kamels will probably survive almost all the time, it's dangerous when the ratio is 60 to 40 or lower (the numbers are just guessed but it is somehow like that)
Gespeichert

Zurzeit nur als Gnom unterwegs (Topfpflanfze - Lvl 31)

Zitat von: Solitaire
Von sinnlosem Spam, hartnäckiger Kleinschreibung, Satzkonstellationen, die nicht einmal einer SMS würdig sind und Texten, bei denen ein Linguist vermutlich einen Herzinfarkt erleiden und ein Sozialforscher seinen ersten Nobelpreis bekommen würde ist absolut alles vorhanden.

Zitat von: Toelpel von Passau
Arguing in a IW-Thread is like running at the special olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded.
Cyrax
knuddelflauschigster

Offline Offline

Beiträge: 2.033


41106958 bmw_530d@hotmail.com Cyrax10780
« am: 25.10.2007 00:42:57 »

As clover said, the ratio counts.

As we see in the german version, Sheeps can't destroy Kamels or Flighthounds. Even if there aren't any Zeus or Kronks you can safely take Kamelz.
It's the same when the defending party has Gravitons oder Plasmalaser. They wouldn't harm the Kamelz.

The Lurchs and Systrans have better Shields, so they can't be destroyed as easy as Kamelz. When the attacking party wins in 99% of all attacks, the Lurch and Systrans survived.

Finally i don't think that this is a bug.
Gespeichert

Zitat
ehemalige diplomatische Beziehungen
Sieg über: EaK, GOAULD, A-RoPb, Kilrathy, WollKneul, FL-TNG, KgB, XQ, DTH, DKH, UWS, Phoenix, EaK, Plan B, WOLF, UFP-NW, JER-2, d3nOObs, -DDZ-
Niederlage:
Seiten: [1]   Nach oben
  Drucken  
 
Gehe zu:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines
Impressum
Prüfe XHTML 1.0 Prüfe CSS